Welcome to Small.To v1.1b

User Functions





Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
Lost your password?

Check this out!

What's New

Stories

No new stories

Comments last 2 days

No new comments

Links last 2 weeks

No recent new links

Search Amazon

   

Cancer-in-Chief

Politic


(The title was actually based on information norcalfella told me: President GW Bush's astrological sign is Cancer.)
On a daily basis, there's just too much information about Bush and Iraq---things that make you go “hmmm...” Here's today's list:

  1. The most trusted man in America warns that “"We have shown arrogance, almost an egotism, in our conduct of foreign policy so that we have alienated most of our former allies in the world” and also that “...the cost of the war and its aftermath, coupled with Bush's proposed tax cuts, would leave a national debt "that our grandchildren's grandchildren will be paying for.” (Admittedly, while the first is a statement of logic, the second implies a certain knowledge of economic theory, which I'm not sure Mr. Cronkite possesses.)

  2. The author of the comic strip “Boondocks” has this to say: “There's three things Bushes do: Make lots of money for themselves and their friends, kill brown people and try to take over the world”...he also has some criticism for both the right and the left.

  3. Maybe it's all part of the crusade?! According to this fellow, the current White House administration is unusually committed to Christianity. (It seems true, until you consider that Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Perle...I don't think any of them are Christian.)

  4. There's a classic poker or negotiations strategy called “the smart dummy”. By pretending to be stupid, folks feel that negotiations can't be made overly complex. They simplify their signals to you. They let down their guard. Very often, they lose. This article claims that George Bush's stupidity is just that sort of act. In fact, I found a copy of his Yale transcript which, despite the claims of the website that hosts it, reflects someone who's not too stupid. B-/C+ isn't what I'd hoped for, sure. But combine that with his admitted substance abuse at the time, and the number of extracurriculars he managed to participate in, and it's anything but stupid.

  5. And who benefits when we attack Iraq? It could be worth $1 Million to VP Cheney, but I suspect that's just icing on the cake.

  6. People around the world claimed to be unaware of the atrocities going on in Nazi Germany for a while. Now, prisoners are dying under suspicious circumstances while being interrogated in Afghanistan. Just last week, a couple of prisoners in GTMO tried to kill themselves, and a couple more died with similar wounds. What checks and balances are in place to prevent policies of torture or torture-by-proxy on the part of the U.S. Government?

  7. Defenders of the realm Texas, speak up. Seems that not being a fan of the President is criminal. Folks down in the “great state” are banning Dixie Chicks albums, because the lead singer said she was embarrassed he came from Texas, at a concert in England. Let that one sink in for a moment. How many of these folks were only too happy to say how embarrassed they were that President Clinton was a philanderer? But criticise his warmongering and commitment to international instability?! Blasphemy! (And what took 'em so long? Couldn't they have hated the Dixie Chicks for not staying true to their Country Roots, for wearing outfits that said they were more about fashion and looks than about music, for getting stupid tattoos, for ruining a perfectly good Fleetwood Mac song in “Landslide”?) Anyone embarrassed Texas wasn't allowed to remain an independent country? (For the record, I actually like the DC, and think “Wide Open Spaces” is a pretty fine tune.)

  8. The administration has identified the list of folks they'd like to accuse of war crimes. I'm confused. We're not at war. And we're going to attack them. So if these guys voluntarily surrendered, immediately, exactly what war crimes would they be guilty of?

  9. Lastly, this astounding display of irrationality. It seems to me that, without the threat of war, Wham-Bam-Saddam wouldn't have permitted inspectors back in the country. But the inspectors found nothing particularly damning. Bush continues to say 'they must disarm'. When people start to catch on to this inconsistency, he changes his path. Now, he says, WbS must leave Iraq to avoid war. I guess we're finally getting to the point of this whole thing: WbS is their weapon of mass destruction. It's all a part of the Bush Doctrine.

Cancer-in-Chief | 12 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Cancer-in-Chief
Authored by: dbsmall on Monday, March 17 2003
I'm perplexed. I no longer know how to distinguish between propaganda and reality. According to this report, Wham-bam-Saddam is distributing chemical weapons for use by his military against attacking U.S. soldiers.

This leads to two possible conclusions:
1) The inspectors were disgustingly incompetent or bought off. I mean, weeks of weapons inspections, and they couldn't find something. But news journalists find evidence of use of weapons they couldn't find?!
2) This is propaganda, a la Tonkin Gulf. Internal psy ops (which really piss me off, by the way) will help shore up support for attacking WbS. No doubt, after the U.S. installs the new Iraqi "provisional" government, we'll find nuclear weapons. When that happens it will be unclear how those got there...

And mark my words, Nigeria's next.
The Idiot Prince Will Have His War
Authored by: dbsmall on Tuesday, March 18 2003
This article discusses what we can expect from a war in Iraq. Among other things, he points out the propaganda about WbS gassing his own people. Pre-emptive points (I can't believe I feel obligated to point these out): Stan Goff is a retired U.S. Army Special Forces Master Sergeant. He's a former instructor of military science at West Point. And he's a self-proclaimed "liberal".
I do not understand Eddie Vedder\'s appeal
Authored by: dbsmall on Friday, April 04 2003
So Eddie Vedder's pulling a "Dixie Chic" maneuver. Puzzling to me, why Pearl Jam is still popular.

I remember when markveglia and I had tickets to Neil Young's Bridge School Benefit concert. markveglia persuaded a couple of women to come with us, because they wanted to see Pearl Jam, who was one of the performers. I very nearly ran into Eddie Vedder milling around before the concert, out on the grass. The Pearl Jam fans were rude to non PJ performers, and it really made the experience less enjoyable. PJ sucks. No, there's no point to my anecdote.
A fair and balanced look at how you form a dictatorship
Authored by: dbsmall on Friday, August 15 2003
Is Bush following the process he learned from his hero, Hitler? First, make folks think they're under attack. Then, in the guise of protecting them, erode their freedoms and begin your attack on the world.
Cancer-in-Chief
Authored by: futurenow on Wednesday, September 10 2003
How about this article about why still haven't found any weapons of mass distruction (Bush now says this is a fight against terrorists as they stream in from neighboring countries to fight their on their last battleground -- how unlikely is that to be true but that is another story.) Basically the missing Anthrax, etc was accounting gaps and scientists boosting production claims to please Saddam. Saddam also to feel powerful boosted claims of his capabilities. Article points out even that the U.S. military in its own internal audit of operations misplaced 1 million chemical protection suits -- if that had happened in Iraq we would have said they had been sold to terrorists, hidden from inspectors, etc.

These revelations disgust me and I agree with the Santa Cruz city council in calling for a full investigation of how we could have been so mislead (bad intelligence, pressures to manipulate data, etc).
Cancer-in-Chief
Authored by: dbsmall on Thursday, September 02 2004