 Subtlety is not one of my strengths
|
Friday, May 18 2012
|
What's NewStoriesNo new storiesComments last 2 daysNo new commentsLinks last 2 weeksNo recent new linksSearch Amazon |
Ritter: Iraq probably didn't have WMD Scott Ritter disliked W-b-S, and quit his job as a U.N. inspector because he said Iraq was hindering his inspections. You'd think a guy like that would support the U.S. attacking Iraq/enforcing said actions. You'd be wrong. He suggests that Iraq probably didn't have WMD, implies that Bush knew this, and asserts that Bush created war on a false accusation. Impeach!
Ritter: Iraq probably didn\'t have WMD
Authored by: dbsmall on
Wednesday, May 07 2003
Senior White House officials admit that Iraq probably didn't have WMD, too. Well, heck, you know they're going to have some soon. I'm sure we have a shipment going there right now, set up to be "found".
Impeach!
[ Reply to This | # ]
Ritter: Iraq probably didn\'t have WMD
Authored by: futurenow on
Monday, July 14 2003
Here is the BBC's latest analysis of the 9 claims made about WMDs before the war and what has been proved after nearly three months of dedicated investigation on the ground.
BBC says -- Of the nine main conclusions in the British government document "Iraq's weapons of mass destruction", not one has been shown to be conclusively true.
With 66 percent of the population in the U.K. now believing that Blair's government misled them on WMD's, the press in the U.K. is bringing the level investigation that seems only finally to be happening in the U.S. over the Niger/Nuclear material story.
[ Reply to This | # ]
Ritter: Iraq probably didn't have WMD
Authored by: dbsmall on
Monday, July 26 2004
Scott Ritter now says that "Saddam's people are winning the war". "There is no elegant solution to our Iraqi debacle. It is no longer a question of winning but rather of mitigating defeat."
[ Reply to This | # ]
Unpatriotic
Authored by: dbsmall on
Wednesday, January 25 2006
Scott Ritter is undoubtedly unpatriotic, for not supporting the CiC in a time of unending war. Then again maybe it's not appropriate to criticize any behavior of a sitting president.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|