Welcome to Small.To v1.1b

User Functions





Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
Lost your password?

Check this out!

What's New

Stories

1 new Stories in the last 24 hours

Comments last 2 days

No new comments

Links last 2 weeks

No recent new links

Search Amazon

   

Who wants to be governor of California

EntertainmentIt's the latest reality TV craze! (Oh, how I wish I could find a hyperlink to Dave Barry's story about how California is poised to take over the "looniest state" title from Florida. (I guess Dave Barry hasn't been to "Evolution is a myth"-Kansas, or "We're proud of W"-Texas or "My sibling is my spouse"-Mississippi".)
Who wants to be governor of California | 1 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Who wants to be governor of California
Authored by: futurenow on Tuesday, August 12 2003
It is only the process that makes us seem stupid, because it is so different from the usually unquestioned 2-party system that we have settled on in the U.S. This dispite the fact it does not represent the CA/New England Republican (fiscal conservative/social liberal -- i.e. governors of MA, NJ, RI, NY and Arnold) or the Southern Democrat (social conservative/fiscal moderate) that could be more successful in a general election than within their own party primaries.

In many ways this is election is very similar to a traditional European election with it more dynamic coalition building among many minority parties. In England it is illegal to hold a campaign that is longer than 90 days (CA election is 83 days). In France last year there were 10 major candidates for prime minister (there are ~7 major candidates in CA), including an extremist that finished a close second in the first round. In Europe Governments are voted out well before the term is up (Italy has almost had a different prime minister every year since World War II). Also you usually have very interesting candidates and parties in these elections.

The fact that there is no run-off is what makes this particularly unrepresentitive. Although actively debated, most political theorists belive that the Australians and Irish have the most fair system -- where you rank each of the candidates and you have an instant run-off between candidates eliminating one candidate at a time. They do agree that simple majority is the worst system.

Of course this could have been avoided if the people when voting on the law didn't listen to the governor in 1911 who argued against major papers like the Chronicle that opposed the law. However as part of the recall process, voters also approved the initiative process which I think most people agree has been more successful even if the courts seem to throw out half of them for contradicting federal or state law and Ashcroft tries to keep others from being enacted.