Welcome to Small.To v1.1b

User Functions





Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
Lost your password?

Check this out!

What's New

Stories

1 new Stories in the last 24 hours

Comments last 2 days

No new comments

Links last 2 weeks

No recent new links

Search Amazon

   

House Proposal to Censure Cancer-in-Chief

Politic"Ranking House Judiciary Democrat Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) has introduced a motion to censure President Bush and Vice President Cheney for providing misleading information to Congress in advance of the Iraq war, failing to respond to written questions and potential violations of international law". (At least neither of them lied about an extramarital affair, huh?) Oh, you can find the text of the proposal on Thomas, by searching for things authored by Conyers.

What we need is a grand jury, where the President cannot refuse to testify under oath. That way, when he pulls nonsense like:
"any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so." (those are the president's own words, on 4/20/2004.)

"And without revealing the operating details of our program, I just want to assure the American people that, one, I've got the authority to do this[wiretap U.S. residents without a court order]; two, it is a necessary part of my job to protect you; and, three, we're guarding your civil liberties." and again on 12/19/2005

I am the law, btches, and you should be thankful I'm here, or you'd be speaking Iraqi, now. And I'll do whatever I damn well please.
House Proposal to Censure Cancer-in-Chief | 7 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
House Proposal to Censure Cancer-in-Chief
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 27 2006

Bluster, talk, blah, blah, blah.

It'll be just like holding people without evidence or access to an attorney, torture or torture-by-proxy, no-bid contracts to Halliburton to reconstruct Iraq which are overbilled and when this is caught are only punished by receiving the "proper" amount, followed by Halliburton getting contracts to rebuilt NOLA, etc. etc. etc.

We'll forget about it soon enough.

And the Democrats are almost as culpable, as most of them are too busy evaluating whether they have the votes to spend energy doing the RIGHT THING.
(You're not in office to get re-elected. You're elected to SERVE us, chuckleheads.)

Lather-rinse-repeat, and if Repub's need a ratings boost to win an election, discover a new tape from Al Ansar. The worst thing, ever, that could happen to the Repubs at this point, would be to "win" in Iraq and capture Osammy.